You are viewing [info]krossbreeder's journal

About this Journal
Current Month
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930
Jun. 27th, 2010 @ 11:41 am My Anthrocon 2010: Pure Ecstacy
...annnnnnnnd I'm back. Such an awesome con!

It was a mere (but heavily-jam packed) 27-hour adventure, but I came, I saw, I overheated, I danced, I overheated, I Zoo'ed, I overheated, I ate, I sped away.

It's never enough time at AC, especially so for my attendance this year, but a MASSIVE, MASSIVE shout-out to Faytt, who *ahem* "handled" me through-out the con, and to his most excellent mate, Walks Among Stars, who so very graciously shared his room with me for a few well-needed hours. And also, it was a great pleasure meeting Woof and Fern and their adorable kitt, even if we didn't get a chance to talk much.

Hope all is well! More detailed follow-up forthcoming...
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&W
Jun. 9th, 2010 @ 11:40 am The Furry Meme!
Yes, I am participating in a meme. Yes, I really do think I'm cool to do so. No, I am not sad.

...Am I?

01. (X) Have you ever howled at the moon? Once or twice ^_^
02. (_) Have you ever barked at someone? I don't think so... I should, though
03. (X) Have you ever found yourself drawing or scribbling furry art when you're supposed to be doing something else? Good Lord. Too often.
04. (X) Have you ever worn an animal costume or tail as a child and pretended to be an animal? Probably not often enough!
05. (_) Have you ever eaten out of a dog bowl? No sir.
06. (X) Have you been to at least one furry con? Yup, but I need MOAR.
07. (X) Do you like to look at furry porn? I have. >.>
08. (X) Do you RP or play Second Life as a furry character? I do! KrossBreeder Fluffy
09. (X) Do you own a fursuit or at least a tail? Four suits. Two tails.
10. (X) Do you know what all these terms mean or have used them at least once?: Yiff, Mundane, Fandom, Murr, Skritch, SPH, Theriomorph, Hyper, Plushie, Follow-me Eyes, Glom, TF, Muck ... That's it? Where are the rest? These are OLD school!
11. (_) Do you have at least 5 videos of you acting or doing something furry on YouTube? LOL Not yet
12. (X) Has your anthropersona/character been drawn in a furry porn type manner? I had no control over that <.< >.>
13. (X) Are you well known in the furry fandom? Define "well known"...
14. (X) Do you dream furry while you sleep? I have!
15. (X) Would you transform into your character/fursona if you were given the chance to live like that for the rest of your life? In a freakin' heartbeat.
16. (X) Have you ever worn a collar? Practically lived in one for a while.
17. (_) Do you own more than 20 art badges of your fursonas or characters? Just a handful.
18. (_) Have you been to more than 20 furry cons in your lifetime? Nope, just a handful.
19. (X) Do you think that deep down you have the spirit of an animal within you? I do. I've been around before I think.
20. (X) Do you enjoy hanging out with other furries? I do, but I need more opportunities!
21. (_) Do you think we should have a furry run for president of the USA? Good Lord, no.
22. (X) If you ever became rich would you own a room in your house that was just to display your fursuits or furry art? ... and my wife would KILL me.
23. (X) Is your best friend furry? I don't think he wants to admit it though.
24. (X) Do your furry friends call you by your furry name in public? When I see them.
25. (X) Have you been in the furry fandom for at least 5 years? Criminey, almost 21 years now.

Total: 19

1 to 5 = Furry wannabe.
6 to 10 = Furry newbie.
11 to 15 = Furry.
16 to 20 = Hardened Furry.
21 to 25 = Hardcore Furry.


LOL Now what do I win?
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
Jun. 4th, 2010 @ 11:40 am Aether. Is. Here.
I'm going to make this short and very sweet, and I'll follow-up with another formal post but I'm just sitting here holding my second copy of Aether fresh from the press, and I have to admit, I am really excited! This copy is incredible, and looking really, really good! A special thank you to all of the artists who took the extra time to resubmit work; It really pops!

So without further ado:

AETHER d'ANIMAUX VOLUME 1 IS OFFICIALLY READY!

For those of you looking to order (just in time for Anthrocon!), here's the link to Lulu.com:

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperba.....c-art/11183201

(Lulu's search feature may not find Aether for a day or so, as I just activated the sale like 10 minutes prior to this journal post).

Distributor orders (Amazon, Barnes N' Noble, etc) are not yet ready (I'm still jumping through the international/distribution hoops) but will be sometime AFTER Anthrocon 2010.

Right now, Lulu.com is offering free shipping within the continental U.S.

For those interested in a discounted price, please PM me. This is a long topic I will address in my next post.

Formal post and pictures to follow.
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
May. 26th, 2010 @ 11:39 am Digital Color Gamuts and File Types
Recently, I have been seeing a lot of questions and confusion about two specific areas of digital creation, Color Gamut/Mode and File Type. I figure, since I teach this subject at CCS, I should really put together a journal! So here it is! It takes me an entire college semester to explain these two worlds in full to my students, but I'll try to sum up quickly here. First of all, most colleges offer a course like this as "Color Theory", because at the end of the day, that's what all this is, a theory. Even though the following "rules" apply very even-handedly across all instances, there are a few anomalies and odd situations where the facts don't hold up. That being said, please take the below as a Standard Guide on these items, and not an unbreakable truth. New technologies are always re-inventing what computers can and cannot do, as is true with file formats etc. But for 2010, I think the below list is pretty safe and has served me well over the past 15 years or so.

"Color Mode" [Image > Mode]
Color Mode can be tricky to understand, because most artists see color as just color. The computer, however, sees color as mathematical uses of ink (or light). In the computer world, we refer to the entire range of color as its "gamut". There are four basic types of color gamuts (color ranges) within all computers: RGB, CMYK, Hexidecimal, and Brand Name (or "Book of Color", i.e. Pantone). There are also many sub-categories of color gamuts within these (Duotone, Index, etc), but these are highly specific and are only really used by professionals for very specific needs. (If you want more info, PM me).

Color Gamuts are separated also by two very extreme differences (which is where your problem is coming from): The world of PRINTED color (ink), and the world of DISPLAYED (light) color. Here are some of the basic uses of each:

RGB Color Gamut
Starting with the largest Color Gamut, we have RGB. RGB stands for Red Green Blue, which is a light-based color system. Since light is a "subtractive" system*, the more colors you bring together, the closer you get to White. For this reason, the three primary colors to the world of LIGHT are Red Green and Blue (which are different than the three primary INK colors we all grew up with, which are the familiar Red Yellow and Blue). Since RGB is a world defined by LIGHT, it is practically unlimited. (Some sources will say there are roughly 128 Million "known" RGB colors, but theoretically RGB is infinite). Since RGB is so vast, you can get colors like neon Pink or Green, or brilliant Blues and Purples. And since these colors are being displayed on your monitor, TV, iPhone etc, they appear clean and bright. However, once you try to print these colors (or save to the wrong File Type), they become muddy or grey. That is because all printed things using physical inks are restricted to a much smaller world of color, the CMYK Gamut.

*Some sources like Wikipedia will call RGB an "additive" process because you are adding the colors together to get the new color. But while you may be physically adding the colors together the resulting colors become lighter than their originals, so the process is technically Subtractive, since the color seems to be getting paler.

CMYK Color Gamut
The CMYK (Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black*) color gamut is exactly opposite of RGB. Where RGB has almost limitless color, CMYK is very tiny (it only contains roughly 200 Thousand colors). This is because physical inks just cannot get as bright as light-based colors like Neon Pink. Even fluorescent inks are pale compared to the potential of light-based colors. Where RGB relies on light to make colors really pop, CMYK inks have only the paper they're printed on. And no paper anywhere shines like a monitor. Another major difference between RGB and CMYK is that where RGB is a "subtractive" process of mixing color, CMYK is "additive". This means that when you mix CMYK colors together, they become darker. Think about when you mix paints together; the result is always darker than what you started with. Technically, if you were to mix C, M, Y, and K together, you would get a very dark black. (Often referred to as Rich Black). By contrast, if you were to mix R, G and B together, you would get pure white. Since CMYK is a vastly, vastly smaller color gamut than RGB, anything that was created in RGB and converted/printed as CMYK will become darker, muddier, and a bit duller.

Here's a Photoshop tip: Two things you can do when painting in RGB from within Photoshop to make sure your colors are print-safe:
First, when you're choosing a color in the the Color Picker, stay away from the upper right-hand corners. These areas contain the super bright colors that ink simply cannot match. When you pick a color and you see the little yellow warning triangle with the "!" inside, that symbol is letting you know that the selected color cannot be printed (and will appear notably duller if you try). When this icon appears, a tiny color box will appear beneath it. This is Photoshop's recommendation for the closest printable color to the "out of gamut" color. You will note that this recommended color is usually much bleaker than your original choice, so some considerable compromise is due.
Second, while you're painting, turn on the Gamut Warning option [View > Gamut Warning]. This will show all problem colors as grey. All this means, is that if you convert/print the image, all of the grey areas will become dull or muddy. (Using the Gamut Warning option does not actually change your colors, it just highlights them). If you turn Gamut Warning back off, the grey will disappear. Please note that this option does not actually modify or repair your colors, it's simply a tool of observation. If you find you have a lot of "problem colors" in your image, there is no simple push-button fix for this. RGB is RGB and CMYK is CMYK. There is nothing in between, so you would have to go through and repaint the problem areas with proper, print-safe CMYK colors. As an aside, bright color does not equal great color. If you find yourself distressed because the colors are not bright enough, try reconsidering your palette and approaching the tones differently. In my opinion, super bright colors are a false way of adding impact to an image.

*They used "K" for Black because "B" refers to Blue in other systems. Incidentally, "K" is a universal symbol for Black.

Hexidecimal (Index) (Web Safe RGB) Color Gamut
Within the vast world of RGB, there resides a specific cluster or colors reserved specifically for the Web. These colors are commonly referred to as Index or Web-Safe colors. The only difference between RGB and Web-safe RGB is the purpose. Since websites are created to be seen by essentially the entire world, they are therefore designed for the lowest-common denominators. Things like screen resolution, operating system, browser type, fonts, and even color. Since not all computers have state-of-the-art graphics cards, and since not all computers are calibrated to display color the same way, many colors will not display correctly. Blue may appear as purple, red may appear as pink, etc. Not to mention super-subtle hues may not even appear at all. So to make sure that your web graphics have the strongest chance of appearing at their best, a sub-set of RGB colors have been pulled aside and identified as the most-likely to display ideally under all circumstances. These are the Web-safe RGB colors. And like CMYK, the Web-safe RGB gamut is only a fraction of true RGB, so many colors will not work or even appear at all.

The term "Hexidecimal", the true name for Web-safe RGB and Index, comes from the six-digit mixture that the computer uses to create the color. For example, "FFFFFF" is white, "FF0000" is red, etc.

Color-Book (Brand-Name) Color Gamuts
Lastly, in much the same way that most computer monitors are not calibrated the same way, neither are printers. Even über-expensive printers are not the same from print house to print house. Magenta may appear very pink in one location, and very orange at another. Not only do printers differ by location, they also differ by print run. As a professional, if you print a brochure and it comes out blue the first time, and then purplish the second time, this is a huge problem. What if I print it here in America, and then again in Japan? Major color differences. Just as Web-safe RGB sets a standard for monitor colors, Color Book Colors (like Pantone) set the standard for printing colors. Essentially, these colors are nothing more than cans of pre-mixed inks that are sold to the print houses so that when you print using Pantone 485 (Coca-Cola Red) in Japan, it will be identical to Pantone 485 in Germany. Of course, since these colors are pre-mixed (and very expensive), you do not paint with them. They are used for logos and other design projects where you only need 2 or 3 colors to be consistent every time.

File Types
So what are file types? We're all familiar with the three-letter suffixes that come after the period on virtually every file on a computer, but what does that mean? Well in the world of graphics, these are indicative of two things: software proprietorship, and compression method. "PSD" for example, stands for "Photoshop Document" and is the exclusive ownership of Adobe. "JPG" stands for "Joint Photographic Experts Group", and thus reflects the name of the company that developed the compression method that makes a JPG a JPG.

Essentially, every file type is a compression technique used to deliver visual content. Some file types are non-destructive ("raw" or "lossless") compression like RAW, TIF, TGA or PSD. Others are variably destructive to a file (or, "lossy") such as JPG, PNG or GIF. Make no mistake about it, anytime you compress a file (by saving as one of these formats) you are harming your file. And once a file has been compressed (say, from a PSD to a JPG), anything that was cut out is gone forever and cannot be retrieved, which is why it is best to save important files in several formats. I personally always save files in three formats:

• PSD — The most reliable, this is my highest-quality working file that I can edit and archive.
• TIF — Making sure LZW compression is turned off and CMYK is on, this is my flattened, high-resolution print-ready file.
• JPG — This is my low-quality file that I use for emailing proofs for approval and posting to online portfolios.

The biggest mistake most artists make, is choosing the wrong File Type to save your work. Just like with Color Gamuts, every File Type is vastly different than the others. Listing the common File Types in order from Highest Quality to Lowest Quality†:

• PSD — Largest file size, no compression.
• TIF — Large file size, little to no compression
• JPG — Midrange file size (depending on compression setting)
• PNG — Midrange file size (depending on compression setting)
• BMP — Midrange file size, heavy compression
• GIF — Smallest file size*, heavy compression, Index color only

†The suggestions are recommended with a context of Photoshop, and within the context of common everyday use for most illustrators. The "correct" file type will ultimately be determined by your OS, style and application, the unique job requirements and the environment for that work.

PSD files are the strongest file type you save to/work with, because it saves everything: colors and ICC profiles, layers, paths, channels, etc. You lose no quality with this type. PSD files should be used as working files, and are not good for anything but Photoshop.

TIF files are my next best option because they retain color information and quality for every pixel of your image. Photoshop recently started allowing you to save layers, paths, etc with a TIF file, but I would not recommend it. Also, turn "LZW" compression off. Keeping it on makes it a glorified JPG, and compresses color information. TIF files should be used as archival files and for printing when quality is important. They may be saved with CMYK, RGB or Pantone, and are not good for the web.

JPG files are varied is size and purpose, depending on their settings. A JPG saved with low compression (Level 12) result in high-res files with very little loss. Files saved with heavy compression (Level 1) will result in horrible quality but smaller file size. Even with the settings at their highest, JPG by its very nature is a compression system, so some information will be compromised. JPGs are ideal for RGB and Web work. CMYK JPGs will result in bizarre printing/displaying problems.

PNG files are an ideal hybrid between JPG and GIF. PNGs retain the same robust colors of a JPG, and also allow transparency like a GIF. They have become the new favored file type for web work, and are ideal for RGB. CMYK will not work.

BMP files are a low-caliber file type that offers little quality control for images. They were originally used for web graphics and GUI interfaces for their small file size. Recent modifications to BMP compression techniques allow much-expanded quality, but still not ideal for quality work.

GIF files serve a purpose only as web graphics. They are tiny, heavily compressed, and work only with a very small number of colors. Good for web work only, Index color only.

*In defense of BMP, I need to mention that BMP gets a bad rap. If I were to take an image in Photoshop and go down the list saving that file in the different aforementioned formats, it would most likely not follow my above list for quality, item for item. You would be correct to say that the 2010 version of the BMP filetype is a large file compared to its 1985 version. Reason is, BMP is a lot like the RAW file format, which aims to preserve color and data quality on a "raw" level, with no compression, etc. However, back in the day when BMP was used heaviest, computers only had the ability to preserve a few thousand colors. BMP was the compression of choice. Fast forward to 2010 when the common computer displays 32 million colors, and the BMP file type does a lot more. As a preservation method, BMP does a great job. But BMP has not progressed much since its inception and has therefore been left behind in new technologies. Large format printers, for example, do not process that file format very well, if at all. So BMP might work well for you as a format to store images for personal use, but on a professional or technical level, BMP is a very hit or miss file type and is therefore not an advisable way to transmit work.

Well there you have it! My first foray into the online foray of edu-blogging. Send checks payable to KrossBreeder, please ^_~

If you have any questions, I'd be more than happy to help! Feel free to PM me.
Hope all is well! Happy designing!

-Kross
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
Mar. 10th, 2010 @ 11:38 am Aether! PUBLISHED! // Publishing Update
Just a quick progress report regarding the publishing of Aether through Lulu.com:

On Friday (March 5, 2010), I received an automated email from Lulu.com (the selected Print-On-Demand printer for Aether) stating that the document PDF was failing to rip because of the size (1.96 gigs).

Lulu's press site says files must be below 2 gigs total. But after trying to produce the file, the email states it must be below 1.8 gigs. The email also states that I am not asked to do anything, as Lulu it sorting it out.

I have sent a follow-up email. I plan to follow-up again today.

Stay tuned! never a dull moment!

-Brian / Kross
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
Mar. 8th, 2010 @ 11:38 am Furries and FurAffinity on Boing Boing
Fur Fun
Lisa Katayama // Rob Beschizza
8:19 AM Monday

"Of all the folks in the geek hierarchy, furries can say a thing or two about getting negative attention from the mainstream. One aficionado of anthropormophic art, fiction and culture, however, would rather to talk about what makes the fandom so fulfilling."

http://www.boingboing.net/features/furry.html

I ran across this article this morning and I thought I would share, as it not only expresses a fairly well-written feeling I share, but also mentions FurAffinity (and others) by name. Like most people who undertake this task, the author and/or interviewee is "trying to set the record straight", which is usually far more damaging than leaving it alone. But in this case, it's not so bad.

What do you think? Thoughts?...
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
Mar. 1st, 2010 @ 11:38 am Aether! PUBLISHED!
What began in the Spring of 2007 has finally come to fruition in the winter of 2010!

It has absolutely been a long haul, full of personal pitfalls and technological nightmares, but after one constant uphill battle, I am finally PROUD to present [drum roll] Aether d'Animaux, volume 1!

I have been saying this all along, but now that it's here, and complete, I cannot express the true level of my pride in this project. Time and expenses aside, this project has offered me tremendous opportunities to network with fellow furs and colleagues alike. The work contained herein is superb and deserves every ounce of its praise. Though a production milestone for me personally, Aether is a massive milestone in professionalism for the genre in general, and I could not have done any of this without the trust, the participation, and the loyalty offered to me by so many. You are all truly exceptional people, and I hope beyond all hope that Aether measures up to your expectations. I know it's surpassed mine, but I'm a bit biased ^_~

Everything has been uploaded to the printer, and I've received their electronic "proof" which looks identical to my own. Great for quality control, not so great for knowing its physical feel.

I have just ordered a personal copy of the book. Once my order comes in, I will review it to make sure everything is in place and that the physical variables are in good condition for public orders. Given the price-tag, I feel an extra-powerful need to inspect quality so as to maximize the end-user's experience and pride.

FINAL SPECS: (as seen on lulu.com's market page)

Aether d'Animaux: A Juried Collection of Anthropomorphic Art
by Brian Kotulis
°°°°° This item has not been rated yet

ISBN: 978-0-557-27464-2
Publisher: KAF! Studio // Intrinsik Design LLC
Copyright: ©2010 KAF! Studio // Intrinsik Design LLC (Standard Copyright License)
Language: English
Country: United States
Publication Date: January 12, 2010

Page Count: 302 pages
Size: U.S. Letter (8-1/2" x 11")(21,59cm x 27,94cm)
Binding: Perfect Bound (Square)
Interior Color: Full-color

Production Time: Ships in 3–5 business days (plus delivery time)

Description:
Aether d'Animaux is a juried collection of many different forms of anthropomorphic artwork, comprised of pieces from the past decade. A new focus delivered in a familiar way, Aether aims to recapture some of the original spirit of this often misunderstood genre.

Price: $97.00 USD

I was able to bring the price down just a little, from $107 to $97 USD... more about this below.

Availability:
Currently, Aether is private, and available by direct link only. I can supply this link here, if desired, or by private message, but until I verify that the book is in final condition, I don't feel comfortable opening the gates for orders. If I do link you to the book, or if you somehow find it on your own, I WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND WAITING UNTIL YOU HEAR FROM ME. I would feel awful if you order a beta and something comes out weird.

I have registered an ISBN number (above). Aether is poised to be a global seller. Once I approve the final copy, I will open sales to the public. At that time, it can be expected at places like Amazon, Barnes and Nobel, Borders etc online shops, as well as order-able through the "brick and mortar" shops, as well as lulu.com's own marketplace.

A little bit about the price:

Many of us are familiar with similarly-themed artbooks like Spectrum, Exposé, etc which cost between $30 and $75, so why is Aetherso much more? The short answer is because Aether is being printed "for free". Art competitions like Spectrum require an Entry Fee in order to submit; every piece of artwork you submit to them, you would pay a fee (anywhere from $25 per piece, to $150 per piece). This money would be collected and used to pay for the printing and other associated expenses, like websites, advertising, etc.
Back in Aether's hay-day, I had contacted many printers for a quote. In all cases, the minimum order is 1,000 books and the cheapest printer was $19,000. This would have made the books a base-price of roughly $20 each (plus tax), comparable to Spectrum, etc. But again, since Aether has zero dollars going in, this was an impossible avenue.

Instead, for poor self-publishers, the other option is Print On-Demand, or POD printing. This allows the publisher (me) to upload materials for free. Instead of printing hundreds of books that sit around on shelves waiting to be purchased, they print the book as it's ordered. This also saves on paper-use.

Alternatives to the full price:

In the coming weeks, based on whatever interest is generated for the book and whatever feedback I receive, I have three plans to reduce costs on this edition:

***** [EDIT: March 4, 2010] ********************
The following option is no longer valid. Due to the anticipated feedback on potential problems and piracy with digital delivery, PDF options have been ruled out

[THIS OPTION OMITTED] First option: PDF version. After a preliminary run of about 15 weeks, I will look at offering a PDF of the book for a marked discount. The PDF will cost roughly between $50 to $75. This price is based on several factors: Foremost, to not undermine the artistic value of the contributing artists by offering a flimsy alternative to a printed product. This is about quality, not quantity. Secondly, to discourage pirates from slicing and dicing a PDF for illegal reprint/resale.

********************************************

Second option: I can offer Aether for sale in sections. We can split Aether into several categories, so it may be purchased as the digital works only, the traditional works, etc. All other content will remain in tact. This will reduce page count and thus price. It will, however, cost more if you were to buy all the sections separate.

Third option: As the publisher, I am offered a discount. I am able to buy a copy for $66 USD ($75, with shipping). The more I buy, the cheaper they are. If I order 25 copies at a time, the price goes down further. It is feasible I can order books on behalf of interested parties. I would need to have a minimum of 25 people at a time order books through me, and we can ship them to you.

Sadly, none of these options are entirely graceful, but that being said, it's a pretty good deal seeing as how this all started from absolutely nothing AND it's so good!


All in all, folks, I am very happy. I hope you all agree. But if you have questions, concerns, or something to say, let me know. I'll do what I can!

Thank you all so much!

-Brian / Kross
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
May. 7th, 2009 @ 11:37 am Life Updates! - Aether is on Facebook
Hello again, everyone! I'm back after a forced hiatus.

What a year, What a year. Although the Second Quarter has only just begun, 2009 is shaping up to be a brutal year. Many of us have been put through the wringer in 2008, with job losses, cuts in school funding, political polarization, not to mention all of the personal dilemmas that float to the top during such storms.

On a personal level, 2008 and 2009 have been turbulent. The agency I work for has been under the same intense threats that have sunk countless jobs across the country (indeed the globe), which has created a gauntlet of double-edged swords: prove your value by working twice as hard to keep your job, but work three times harder when the people in your team are let go and you absorb all of their work. As it stands, I already work faster than my teammates, so now what was once considered "going the extra mile" is now simply par for the course. Workloads and expectations have been ramped way up, and we're no where near done with the crises.

Several close family members and a good friend have passed away this year. Some [somewhat] expected, like my dear grandmother of 92, but some very unexpected, like good friend Travis, who was one of four friends struck and killed in a drunk driving accident just over three weeks ago.

DO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE.

Your drunken escapades are not nearly as cool as you think they are. if you're drinking, keep it inside where it belongs. 'Nuff said.

My father, who is now the oldest member of my family, has been irrational about his pending doom. Granted, he's 70 in a country where average male life expectancy is 75, but his fear is an all-consuming emotion that has swallowed the whole family.

As many of you may know, I work three jobs (CD at an automotive ad agency, professor at the college, and agency freelancer on the weekends) and all of it has been slowly tipping into the fan since about June of 2008. With work becoming harder and harder to secure let alone find, I've been all the more reluctant to let go of accounts or jobs that I would normally sign off on.

No surprise, home-life is suffering. Personal projects have been nearly impossible to work on, and the very furry genre that has inspired me privately all these years has become a treat I rarely savor.

It's time for a change.

In the spirit of spring cleaning, I am carving out all of the things I do not absolutely need, and purging all of the hangers-on that leach my soul. It's an easier-said-than-done task, but state of mind being what it is, I am experiencing a Great Purge. This month, by design, marks the conclusion to several long-term projects that have been pulling me down for many months, and while I am proud of the end products, I have sacrificed way more than the projects were worth and I am ready to be done with them. I have resisted the urge to fill every opening with new work in an attempt to free up some time for personal endeavors, like:

AETHER! For all of the above reasons and many more, this project has taken many hits. An all-but-crippled time-line that stems back directly to the Hard Drive crash, the up-hill battle turned into an up-mountain epoche. My biggest failing of all however has been the inconsistency of delivering fresh news and updates. The time it takes to update and push HTML, update blogs and journals, or compose politically-correct emails has been time impossible to find. I am fully aware that this is no excuse, and have tried securing some aides, but it hasn't work out for the same time reasons.

COMMISSIONS! Aether is my top, personal, prooject right now WAAY past schedule, I am going to finish out Aether before I can dedicate myself to new commissions. But that being said, there are some commissions still on the board (Kora, Kaelan, Rael, Kritter, etc...) that need attention too.

NETWORKING! Now that Facebook has opened-up it's TOS, I have put Aether on Facebook for all people interested in following what I am doing on a daily basis. Unlike HTML, blogs and email, this is a much simpler solution update-able from my iPhone at any time. It will also be a good place to post some behind the scenes action and other project-specific materials. Aether's official page can be found by searching for:

Aether d'Animaux: A Juried Collection of Anthropomorphic Art

Also for the record, I have created my personal page too, for:
KrossBreeder Fluffy (which, incidentally, is my [horrible] Second Life name for all interested geeks.)

Well that pretty much does it for now. As always, please feel free to comment or question, and I will get back to you as soon as I can!... And now to respond to my backlogged 10,730 FA comments...
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
Apr. 6th, 2009 @ 11:37 am Dorothy, 1916-2009
Considering how infrequently I update my various blogs and journals, it saddens me that I must pick-up where I left off with a note of grief.

My grandmother passed away Wednesday, April 01 at the age of 92. Dorothy was the quintessential mother, grandmother, and great grandmother. She was spiritual and compassionate, loving and graceful. Her presence in my life has been tremendous, and her passing saddens me equally so.

I will always remember her love and her selflessness. She worried about complete strangers, and went out of her way to help everyone around her. As the priest accurately said of her during his sermon, if you left her home hungry, then shame on you for it was not for lack of offering.

Though you will be greatly missed, Big Grandma, I shall honor your faith and your compassion always.

Dorothy L. K., 1916-2009.
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W
Sep. 5th, 2008 @ 04:45 pm Breaching the Politcal Gamut
The following began as a response to a peer's journal; a journal whose words mirrored my own basic fears about the potential U.S. Vice President nominee, Sarah Palin.

Generally speaking, I do not like to talk about politics because it's "rude" and opens the door for a lot of crass counter-points. But it was because of this seething silence during the 2004 Bush re-election that the nation's worst president in history was able to re-capture the White House and thereby continue driving this nation into the ground.

...

As a matter of disclaiming myself, I am, most often, an ultra-dedicated Democrat. This does not mean I cannot be swayed, it simply means I have not heard anything come from the ideals of the Republican party to tempt me.

With that being said, my dedication to Obama holds steadfast...not simply because I dislike McCain, but because I prefer Obama's approach to pretty much every major issue facing America and the world.

I have been watching the various convention speeches for both parties, and I am terrified by Palin.

I have a strong feeling that she will be in control at some point during a McCain Administration, and that idea also terrifies me endlessly. I'm happy she has no regrets in her small-town life. I'm happy she's accomplished so much in her community the size of my High School. I'm happy to hear that she seems to think nothing of running a country tangent to running a household of children and forthcoming grandchildren. I'm even happy she knows how to field-dress a moose. But I fail to see how any of these accomplishments qualifies a person to take the reigns of the World's most powerful nation of millions,... a nation circling the drain and facing a massive recession due to the very poor leadership of her own party.

Her views on gun-ownership and abortion, while relevant and sincere, aren't even in the top 5 concerns ailing our nation. What real perspective is she going to offer for the Economy? The War? The Environment? Global Warming, the CIA, or our national budget?? Her success stories in small-town, isolated America are not going to translate to anything on the National level, nor do I care to let her try. Obama's "inexperience" is eclipsed by her own political isolation.

Although I am a staunch Obama supporter, I used to take comfort in knowing that if McCain won the election, at least he had made comments regarding the preservation of the environment and global warming. But now that Palin has said she wishes to essentially strip-mine and drill her native Alaska of its oil, I am gravely concerned. This country—the world—needs real, new solutions to its energy needs. Her solution is to just keep looking for more of the same sources...sources like the Wildlife Preserve which are protected for reasons far greater than fears of upsetting the animals. Taking Alaska's oil will do nothing for this country except line Palin's native Alaska's coffers with money and, at best, provide a very brief stop-gap to importing foreign oil.

This election is not just about who's going to raise your taxes and who's not. It's not about who has been to war and who hasn't. It's not even about who has more dedication to their countrymen...This election could, and very well may, decide the fate of the world. How the world views America, how it responds to America, how it heals or continues to ail. We absolutely, positively, MUST change our direction of priority. I am completely unconvinced McCain or (God forbid) Palin can or even want to do that.

I am not trying to pick fights or ignite wars of the words. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs and feelings. But Palin and by proxy McCain scare me to death.
About this Entry
KB LJ Avatar B&amp;W